Monday, June 15, 2009

Should a person Wear a Marriage Ring or not?

It was, basically, in the 2nd world war the use of marriage rings by men became commoner. They were pleased to make public their dedication to their other half by the wearing of a public symbol that announced that dedication to all. Given this practice of wearing mens marriage bands was sensibly new it was more creditable that these men were prepared to forego the marital obscurity open to them from not wearing a ring and actively chose to make a public statement about their choice.

Today it is as common for a recently married man to wear a ring as not. The modern man may consider it his duty to pick to make the same public marital statement as his other half will.

In fact, in today of equality, if she is prepared to make a statement then should he not do so as well? Notwithstanding the proven fact that the wearing of a ring by a lady is a matter of choice, it is really virtually mandatory because of the fact that it's so common. Get tons more info all about wedding favors. But in most unions, this is not necessarily the case. Finally though , the wearing of a men's ring is only 1 of many decisions the man will have to make when he makes the dedication to marry. This idea came originally from the traditional Greeks who thought this finger had an artery which flowed directly to the heart. While anatomically wrong this makes for good myth. Once the person or couple have made the choice to get a men's marriage ring for him there are still choices to make. Do they need to wear a matching set? Or does he favor that his ring looks quite different to his better half's. It is completely possible for a pair to get a ring set where the style of the rings match completely, or maybe with matching engraved messages of love.

No comments:

Post a Comment